HereSay

Clashing Videos

Islamist Peace, Israel Apartheid?

2009 IAW @ York -- part 1

2009 IAW @ York -- part 2

Raging @ the West

Raging @ Islam

We Con The World

Da Bomb

Islamophobia?

Archives

Apartheid in self-defense

 Apartheid in self defense

Israel Apartheid Week is coming to YorkU town again.  And, again, Israel will get charged with apartheid.  No doubt it will be another riot.

Seems like a joke, though.  How any nation can be charged with apartheid in self-defense.  Since no one could even conceive charging any other country or people fighting to defend themselves with apartheid.

What can it mean?  Where’s the coherence?  If, for example, you fight back to defend yourself when getting assaulted?  It can’t be discrimination.  You don’t fight back in self-defense because of who assaults you.  You fight back in self-defense to stop the assault — regardless who assaults you.

Imagine you keep getting assaulted — yet always manage effectively defending yourself.  Imagine your assailants demanding why you keep defending yourself.  What’s wrong with you?  Can’t you understand how right they are when assaulting you?  Imagine they accuse you defend yourself only to discriminate them.  Imagine they run around the world charging you with apartheid.  All outraged you won’t simply lie down and take it like you should.  All bewildered you don’t seem willing to get into the spirit of their assaulting.  Where’s the coherence?  It would be comedy — if there was not so much tragedy.  Because it isn’t merely assault Islamist assailants are into.  Whether in terms of “liberating Tel-Aviv” or “pushing into the sea” or “wiping off the map” — god willing — Islamist assailants have never made their ultimate goal secret.

Israel Apartheid Weeks are no joke.  They are turning into regular, yearly campus riots — nowhere more so than at York University.  How come?  Is there no understanding how offensive apartheid is?  How it can’t conceivably be defensive?  Why it can never be done in self-defense?

Where’s the coherence?  Here’s the coherence.  The coherence not of apartheid — but of anti-Semitism.  The coherence of absolute hatred.  Hatred so absolute it cannot fail to construe anything — including self-defense — as offensive.  The kind of hatred Rick Salutin attempted to pass-off as legitimate criticism of Israel.  Far more explosively coupled by the sort of anti-Jew hatred Palestinian children have learned not only from Farfour.

Not that Farfour can account why Islamist societies must keep promising and attempting to genocide Israel.  Farfour could not have emerged from cultural and historical vacuum.  To the contrary — Farfour was vividly representing and instructing the established discourse.  This is what must be understood.  How the ideology of anti-Jew hatred grew so absolute that even self-defense has become offensive.  Why Gazans have chartered themselves on genociding Israel.  Why they must keep trying to destroy someone else’s country — instead of building their own.

Someone had better explain how, why and what Naqba really means.  Just to give peace a snowball’s chance in the Middle-East.  Because even the most absolute hatred can be addressed — if only it can be understood.  Meanwhile, though?  Check the peak Israel Apartheid Week experience anywhere.   Feel it.

 Apartheid in self defense

24 comments to Apartheid in self-defense

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree